Skip to main content
· 12/15/1871

Rice v. Shook

Citations

  • 27 Ark. 137

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • deeming plaintiffs “statements on brief as the equivalent of a motion to amend the subject complaint to raise a takings claim”
  • granting leave to a plaintiff to formally amend a complaint in order to assert a new claim
  • deeming “plaintiff’s statements on brief as the equivalent of a motion to amend the subject complaint”
  • dismissing a contract claim for lack of jurisdiction because the plaintiff was not in privity with the United States

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harrison, McClure

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.