· 12/15/1871
Rice v. Shook
Citations
- 27 Ark. 137
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- deeming plaintiffs “statements on brief as the equivalent of a motion to amend the subject complaint to raise a takings claim”
- granting leave to a plaintiff to formally amend a complaint in order to assert a new claim
- deeming “plaintiff’s statements on brief as the equivalent of a motion to amend the subject complaint”
- dismissing a contract claim for lack of jurisdiction because the plaintiff was not in privity with the United States
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harrison, McClure
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.