· 4/24/2020
Rice v. Kroger
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 2654
Syllabus
Summary judgment reversed because reasonable persons could dispute whether the danger posed by an empty pallet next to a produce bin was an open and obvious danger to someone approaching it from a certain direction.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reasoning that the common law of contracts is inapplicable to nonjudicial foreclosure sales because, inter alia, applying the common law would interfere with the DTA’s “detailed set of procedures for nonjudicial foreclosure sales”
- rev’d on other grounds, Udall v. T.D. Escrow Servs., Inc., 159 Wash.2d 903, 154 P.3d 882 (2007)
- rev’d on other grounds, Udall v. T.D. Escrow Servs., Inc., 159 Wash.2d 903, 911, 154 P.3d 882 (2007) (“The trustee’s delivery of the deed to the purchaser is a ministerial act, symbolizing conveyance of property rights to the purchaser.”)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pietrykowski
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.