Skip to main content
· 1/9/1907

Rice v. Knostman

Citations

  • 45 Wash. 282
  • 88 P. 194
  • 1907 Wash. LEXIS 456

Syllabus

<p>Contracts — Construction—Trover and Coversion. Under a contract whereby C. was to cut a certain quantity of plaintiff’s timber for which he was to be paid a fixed sum, and was allowed to cut other timber for himself at a certain price per thousand feet as stumpage, without any provision as to which should be cut first, it is not a violation of the contract to cut his part first, and a sale thereof by him before cutting the timber for the plaintiffs would not amount to a conversion of their property.</p> <p>Appeal — Record. Error in admitting or excluding evidence cannot be considered in the absence of a bill of exceptions or statement of facts.</p>

Judges: Fullerton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.