Rice v. Clemmer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding market share of 60–69%, when coupled with other evidence of additional factors, adequate to support a jury 27 determination of monopoly power
• considering “lucrative terms offered for the pictures by exhibitors” to define relevant market
• considering “lucrative terms offered for the pictures by exhibitors” to define relevant market
• 60-69% market share accompanied by a frag- mentation of competition sufficient to show “monopoly power” over a market as required for violations of section 2 of the Sherman Act
• 60-69% market share accompanied by a fragmentation of competition sufficient to show \monopoly power\ over a market as required for violations of section 2 of the Sherman Act
• where a general jury verdict is reviewed for sufficiency of the evidence, it ordinarily will be “upheld only if there is substantial evidence to support each and every theory of liability submitted to the jury”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).