RICARDO RANGEL v. STATE OF FLORIDA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court properly exercised its discretion by not departing where the record showed that it considered all circumstances
• holding that the district court properly exercised its discretion by not departing where the record showed that it considered all circumstances
• concluding that district court did not abuse its discretion when “the record demonstrate[d] that the district court carefully considered circumstances for and against departure and deliberately exercised its discretion”
• stating that a sentencing court does not abuse its discretion if it carefully evaluated the testimony and information presented before making its determination
• stating that district court is not required to grant departure, even if mitigating circumstances are present
• stating that a district court is not required to grant a departure, even if mitigating circumstances are present

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).