Ricard v. Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• underscoring that the LMRA “cannot be read broadly to pre-empt 21 nonnegotiable rights conferred on individual employees as a matter of state law” (emphasis 22 added)
• recognizing the “inordinate danger” confronting police officers conducting traffic stops
• “If [a] party claim only a limited estate, and not a fee, the law will not, contrary to his intentions, enlarge it to a fee”
• where state cannot foresee, and therefore provide meaningful 21 hearing prior to, deprivation statutory provision for post-deprivation hearing or common 22 law tort remedy for erroneous deprivation satisfies due process
• \the law will not presume a wrong\
• \the law will not presume a wrong\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).