Riboni v. DIST. CT. IN & FOR TENTH JUD. DIST.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying a request for a special prosecutor where there was no indication the impeachment testimony of the district attorney stemming from an interview with the defendant would be needed
• accepting jurisdiction over original proceeding brought by party seeking relief in the nature of mandamus pursuant to C.A.R. 21 for distinct attorney disqualification
• “The mere fact that the defense intends to call the prosecutor as a witness does not, without more, dispose of the [disqualification] question.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).