Ribghy v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court may supply a minimum quantity term to an indefinite-quantity contract when the parties failed to include that term
• “Here, the contracts contained the FAR-mandated indefinite-quantity clause, obligating defendant to order some minimum quantity of plaintiffs services.” (discussing 48 C.F.R. § 52.216-22)
• “Since the Supreme Court decided Willard in 1923, however, Congress authorized promulgation of FAR 52.216-22 (“indefinite-quantity clause”
• indefinite quantity contract for mowing and maintenance service was enforceable because there was an ascertainable minimum quantity
• it has long been stated in case law that the buyer must be obligated to purchase a minimum quantity in order for the agreement to be enforceable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).