Rhuland v. Fahr

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that there must be existing pleadings to amend before relation back can occur
• affirming circuit court’s dismissal of a complaint because daughter lacked standing to bring wrongful death suit in her capacity as an heir
• referring to the lack of reference 9 that Rhuland was filing as the personal representative at the time the original complaint was filed in addressing a real party in interest argument under Ark. R. Civ. P. 17
• substitution of entirely new plaintiffs results in the filing of a new suit and [does] not constitute an amendment under Rule 15
• Rules 15 and 17 were inapplicable where “no such understandable mistake occurred”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).