Skip to main content
· 5/17/2011

Rhodes v. USAA Casualty Insurance

Citations

  • 21 A.3d 1253
  • 2011 Pa. Super. 105
  • 2011 Pa. Super. LEXIS 612
  • 2011 WL 1844148

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that discovery orders by and large are “not final, and are therefore unappealable.”
  • noting that “[g]enerally, discovery orders involving purportedly privileged material are appealable” under the collateral order doctrine
  • noting that, “[g]enerally, discovery orders involving purportedly privileged material are appealable” under the collateral order doctrine
  • holding expectations of the insureds are not material to bad faith liability
  • stating “discovery orders involving purportedly privileged material are appealable because if immediate appellate review is not granted, the disclosure of documents cannot be undone and subsequent appellate review would be rendered moot”
  • granting collateral review of a discovery order involving purportedly privileged material

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Elliott, Bender, Freedberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.