Rhodes v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where defendant believed substance he attempted to purchase was cocaine, fact that it was imitation did not prevent conviction for attempted possession of controlled substance
• where defendant believed substance he attempted to purchase was cocaine, fact that it was imitation did not prevent conviction for attempted possession of controlled substance
• “Here, there was a fatal variance between the indictment alleging that the appellant stole $2,550 currency and the proof of a theft of a check for that amount.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ex Parte Walls
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1997-11-14· cited 25×
• Davis v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1999-03-26· cited 16×
• Wallace v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2013-02-15· cited 4×
• Hall v. State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2016-03-25

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Chaney v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1982-07-27· cited 43×