Skip to main content
· 8/1/1990

Rhodes v. Piggly Wiggly Alabama Distributing Co.

Citations

  • 741 F. Supp. 1542
  • 12 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2485
  • 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9890
  • 1990 WL 108329

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • found that the absence of a jury imperative in ERISA indicates a \conscious recognition by Congress\ of the Seventh Amendment imperative
  • found that the absence of a jury imperative in ERISA indicates a “conscious recognition by Congress” of the Seventh Amendment imperative

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Acker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.