· 8/26/1968
Rhodes v. Lucero
Citations
- 444 P.2d 588
- 79 N.M. 403
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a plaintiff’s rights to recovery are contingent upon either a judgment or a right authorized by statute
- declaratory judgment action brought by plaintiff insurer and plaintiff insured who had no judgment against defendant insured was dismissed as plaintiffs' rights of recovery were contingent
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Compton, Chavez, Noble
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.