Skip to main content
· 8/26/1968

Rhodes v. Lucero

Citations

  • 444 P.2d 588
  • 79 N.M. 403

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a plaintiff’s rights to recovery are contingent upon either a judgment or a right authorized by statute
  • declaratory judgment action brought by plaintiff insurer and plaintiff insured who had no judgment against defendant insured was dismissed as plaintiffs' rights of recovery were contingent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Compton, Chavez, Noble

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.