Rhodes v. Fromenthal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the juvenile's unrefuted, exculpatory, and not unreasonable explanation that driver told him the truck in which he was riding belonged to driver's uncle precluded conviction for theft
• holding that the juvenile’s unrefuted, exculpatory, and not unreasonable explanation that driver told him the truck in which he was riding belonged to driver’s uncle precluded conviction for theft
• involving driver who told defendant that truck belonged to driver's uncle
• involving driver who told defendant that truck belonged to driver's uncle
• without evidence of separate criminal conduct, such as aiding and abetting the theft itself or being an accessory after the fact of the crime, a passenger may not be found guilty of an offense related to the vehicle, even if he is aware that it has been stolen
• without evidence of separate criminal conduct, such as aiding and abetting the theft itself or being an' accessory after the fact of the crime, a passenger may not be found guilty of an offense related to the vehicle, even if he is aware that it has been stolen

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).