Texas Supreme Court· 10/10/1990
Rhodes v. Cahill
Citations
- 802 S.W.2d 643
- 34 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 33
- 1990 Tex. LEXIS 124
- 1990 WL 153215
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that adverse possession or acquisition by prescription must involve possession that is visible, notorious, distinct, and hostile
- stating that adverse possession or acquisition by prescription must involve possession that is visible, notorious, distinct, and hostile
- explaining that a successful party may be required to pay an attorney ad litem’s fees as costs pursuant to Tex. R. Civ. P. 244
- explaining that ad litem fees under Tex. R. Civ. P. 244 should be taxed as costs of the case
- stating that adverse possession or acquisition by prescription must involve possession that is visible, notorious, distinct, and hostile
- noting that “possession must be of such character as to indicate unmistakably an assertion of a claim of exclusive ownership in the occupant” (emphasis in original)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Phillips
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
170 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Huckabee v. Time Warner Entertainment Co.Texas Supreme Court· 2000-05-04· cited 260×
- Ellis County State Bank v. KeeverTexas Supreme Court· 1994-09-03· cited 217×
- BP America Production Co. v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court· 2011-05-13· cited 188×
- Grace v. KochOhio Supreme Court· 1998-05-06· cited 167×
- Templeton v. DreissTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1998-01-21· cited 102×
- Tran v. MacHaTexas Supreme Court· 2006-12-01· cited 86×
- Kinder Morgan North Texas Pipeline, L.P. v. JustissTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2006-09-05· cited 61×
- Dyer v. CottonTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2010-11-18· cited 61×
- McAllister v. SamuelsCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1993-06-24· cited 55×
- Cherokee Water Co. v. FreemanTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2004-10-13· cited 43×
- Perkins v. McGeheeCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2004-03-25· cited 36×
- Masonic Building Ass'n of Houston v. McWhorterTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2005-05-12· cited 33×
- Kazmir v. BenavidesTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2009-06-23· cited 32×
- Martin v. McDonnoldTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2007-07-25· cited 31×
- Sarandos v. BlantonTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2000-07-26· cited 31×
- Parker v. McGinnesTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1992-12-03· cited 27×
- Hatch v. WilliamsTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2003-06-04· cited 26×
- Bernal v. ChavezTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2006-02-09· cited 24×
- Wall v. CarrellTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 1995-01-11· cited 24×
- Egna Bishop Villarreal v. Guillermo Gonzalez GuerraTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2014-07-02· cited 24×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Sanders v. HarderTexas Supreme Court· 1950-02-08· cited 186×
- Orsborn v. Deep Rock Oil Corp.Texas Supreme Court· 1954-03-31· cited 166×
- Butler v. HansonTexas Supreme Court· 1970-06-10· cited 126×
- McDonnold v. WeinachtTexas Supreme Court· 1971-03-10· cited 97×
- Bywaters v. GannonTexas Supreme Court· 1985-02-20· cited 82×
- City of Beaumont v. GrahamTexas Supreme Court· 1969-04-16· cited 75×
- Heard v. StateTexas Supreme Court· 1947-10-01· cited 53×
- Ramirez v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1978-12-14· cited 34×
- McBurney v. KnoxTexas Commission of Appeals· 1925-06-24· cited 30×
- Fourticq v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1984-06-08· cited 22×
- Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. v. SharpCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1979-07-31· cited 12×
- Butler v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1968-09-25· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.