Skip to main content
· 7/10/1946

Rhodenbaugh v. Preferred Acc. Ins.

Citations

  • 67 F. Supp. 379
  • 1946 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2345

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Having identified the relevant policies, and, having examined them in light of this factual context, it becomes evident that both policies would be served by the application in this case of New Jersey’s own law.”
  • “We glean from Heavner that the critical determination underlying the ‘borrowing’ of a foreign statute of limitations is a determination as to whether a foreign substantive law is to be applied.”
  • Appendix to concurring opinion of Gibbons, J.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilkin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.