Skip to main content
· 10/14/1998

Rhoden v. State Department of Correction

Citations

  • 984 S.W.2d 955
  • 1998 Tenn. App. LEXIS 686

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The proper vehicle for challenging a disciplinary action is a petition for a common law writ of certiorari . . . .”
  • “The proper vehicle for challenging a disciplinary action is a petition for a common law writ of certiorari. . . .”
  • “A prisoner disciplinary proceeding cannot be reviewed directly under the Uniform Administrative Procedures Act because the Act removes such proceedings from the definition of a contested case.”
  • no Tenn. R.App. P. 11 application filed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cantrell, Todd, Middle, Koch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.