Rhoden v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the defendant’s flight was provoked because the defendant’s “flight” occurred before knowing the approaching individuals were law enforcement
• distinguishing Wardlow, reversing convictions, and concluding that trial court should have granted suppression \[b]ecause the officers did not have the reasonable suspicion necessary to authorize an investigatory stop after Rhoden's provoked flight\ in high crime area

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• R.R. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-04-09· cited 6×
• State v. Law
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-04-24· cited 2×
• State v. Champers
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-11-01
• CARTER v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-06-21
• R.E.F. v. State of Alabama (Appeal from Houston Circuit Court: CC-18-2679, CC-18-2681, CC-18-2682, and CC-18-2683)
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2024-08-23

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Terry v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
• Illinois v. Wardlow
  Supreme Court· 2000-01-19· cited 4,162×
• Fitzpatrick v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2005-04-21· cited 155×
• Slydell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-08-29· cited 62×
• Jay v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-04-14· cited 44×
• Bautista v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-05-27· cited 17×
• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-16· cited 6×