Skip to main content
· 1/6/2000

Rhode Island Laborers' v. Rhode Island State Labor Rel. Brd, 97-3841 (2000)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying absolute immunity to social workers who allegedly fabricated evidence during an investigation and made false statements in a dependency petition affidavit
  • allowing a section 1983 action to proceed against 5 social workers for allegedly providing perjured testimony in a dependency proceeding that 6 resulted in a mother losing custody
  • allowing a section 1983 action to proceed against 7 social workers for allegedly providing perjured testimony in a dependency proceeding that 8 resulted in a mother losing custody
  • affirming the district court’s determination that government- employed social workers were not entitled to qualified immunity where they used perjured testimony and fabricated evidence to support the termination of a parent’s right to custody of her child
  • affirming the determination of the district court that perjury by government-employed social workers and the use of false evidence were incompatible with the Fourteenth Amendment guarantee of due process in court and thus defendants were not entitled to qualified immunity
  • “[T]he knowing use of false evidence [is] absolutely and obviously 10 irreconcilable with the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee of Due Process in our courts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: <bold><underline>CLIFTON. J</underline></bold>.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.