Skip to main content
· 7/20/1998

Rhinevault v. Rhinevault

Citations

  • 959 P.2d 687
  • 91 Wash. App. 688

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring such compliance “so the reviewing court has before it all the evidence relevant to deciding the issues”
  • Court’s may decline to reach the merits of an issue where record not properly perfected.
  • it is the appellant’s burden to perfect the record so the reviewing court has all of the relevant evidence before it.
  • appellant bears the burden to perfect the record on appeal “so the reviewing court has before it all the evidence relevant to deciding the issues”
  • “the appellant bears the burden of . . . perfecting [their] record on appeal so the reviewing court has before it all the evidence relevant to deciding the issues before it”
  • “the appellant bears the burden of complying with the Rules of Appellate Procedure (“RAP”). . . . The court may decline to reach the merits of an issue if this burden is not met.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Webster

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.