· 7/20/1998
Rhinevault v. Rhinevault
Citations
- 959 P.2d 687
- 91 Wash. App. 688
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- requiring such compliance “so the reviewing court has before it all the evidence relevant to deciding the issues”
- Court’s may decline to reach the merits of an issue where record not properly perfected.
- it is the appellant’s burden to perfect the record so the reviewing court has all of the relevant evidence before it.
- appellant bears the burden to perfect the record on appeal “so the reviewing court has before it all the evidence relevant to deciding the issues”
- “the appellant bears the burden of . . . perfecting [their] record on appeal so the reviewing court has before it all the evidence relevant to deciding the issues before it”
- “the appellant bears the burden of complying with the Rules of Appellate Procedure (“RAP”). . . . The court may decline to reach the merits of an issue if this burden is not met.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Webster
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.