Rhiannon Tanaka v. University of Southern California Michael Garrett Daryl Gross Pacific-10 Conference National Collegiate Athletic Association

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that defining a relevant market in terms of reasonable interchangeability “encompasses notions of ... product use, quality, and description”
• explaining that the anticompetitive effects must be felt in the “relevant market”
• affirming dismissal of case on grounds that “markets” identified in first amended complaint were not “appropriately defined for antitrust purposes, even at this stage of the litigation”
• affirming dismissal where plaintiffs failed to identify an appropriate product market
• UCLA women's soccer program does not constitute its own market because other college programs compete to recruit student-athletes
• “Failure to identify a relevant market is a proper ground for dismissing a Sherman Act 8 claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).