Rheuark v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the initial decision to grant or deny probation is entirely within the discretion of the trial court and is not reviewable on appeal
• holding that the initial decision to grant or deny probation is entirely within the discretion of the trial court and is not reviewable on appeal
• holding that the initial decision to grant or deny probation is entirely within the discretion of the trial court and is not reviewable on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Prestwood v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2005-02-25· cited 30×
• Ex Parte Rivers
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1995-10-03· cited 22×
• Sanders v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2005-08-26· cited 9×
• Reed v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1996-10-11· cited 6×
• Hastings v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2005-12-23· cited 4×
• Thomas v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1994-11-15· cited 3×
• Bostwick v. ALA. BD. OF PARDONS AND PAROLES
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2003-03-21· cited 2×
• Gilmore v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1995-09-29· cited 2×
• Romanick v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2001-10-19

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Armstrong v. State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1975-03-13· cited 416×
• Roden v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1980-06-17· cited 20×
• Markley v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1987-04-14· cited 18×
• Rheuark v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1992-01-31· cited 11×
• Lockett v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1985-08-20· cited 3×