· 1/8/2002
Rheox, Inc. v. Entact, Inc., Defendant/third Party v. Rmt, Inc. And American Minerals, Inc., Third-Party
Citations
- 276 F.3d 1319
- 61 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1368
- 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 236
- 2002 WL 204964
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Explicit arguments made during prosecution to overcome prior art can lead to narrow claim interpretations .... ”
- arguments and amendments made during patent prosecution “can lead to narrow claim interpretations because ‘the public has a right to rely on such definitive statements . . . .’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schall, Gajarsa, Linn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.