Skip to main content
· 1/8/2002

Rheox, Inc. v. Entact, Inc., Defendant/third Party v. Rmt, Inc. And American Minerals, Inc., Third-Party

Citations

  • 276 F.3d 1319
  • 61 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1368
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 236
  • 2002 WL 204964

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Explicit arguments made during prosecution to overcome prior art can lead to narrow claim interpretations .... ”
  • arguments and amendments made during patent prosecution “can lead to narrow claim interpretations because ‘the public has a right to rely on such definitive statements . . . .’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schall, Gajarsa, Linn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.