Skip to main content
· 5/6/1932

Rhamstine v. Sparks-Withington Co.

Citations

  • 58 F.2d 583
  • 13 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 350
  • 1932 U.S. App. LEXIS 4727

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the elements of common-law fraud are (1) false material misrepresentation by the defendant; (2) the defendant's knowledge that the representation was false; (3) the defendant's intention that the plaintiff rely on the false representation; (4
  • interpreting the discovery rule in the context of Oregon Revised Statute § 12.110(1), which uses language materially identical to § 124.130

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hickenloopjsr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.