R.H. v. Tuscaloosa Cnty. Dep't of Human Res.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• taking judicial notice of prior proceedings between the parties “before the 27 bankruptcy court and the California Superior Court” because they directly related to the claims in that case
• “Glassey 26 lacks standing to enforce any cause of action based on Title 18 27 that he has alleged.”
• “Glassey lacks standing to enforce any cause of action based on Title 18 that he has alleged.”
• “Private parties generally lack standing to enforce federal criminal statutes … [Plaintiff] lacks standing to enforce 27 any cause of action based on Title 18 that he has alleged.”
• “Private parties generally lack standing to 21 enforce federal criminal statutes . . . [Plaintiff] lacks standing to enforce any cause of action based 22 on Title 18 that he has alleged.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).