Skip to main content
· 4/12/2011

R.H. v. Smith Ex Rel. C.H.

Citations

  • 339 S.W.3d 756
  • 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 2702
  • 2011 WL 1367036

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that, on proper request of party, trial court was required to make findings of fact and conclusions of law following hearing on motion at which conflicting evidence was presented

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fitzgerald, Lang-Miers, Fillmore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.