R.H. Ashenbaugh v. Crucible Inc. 1975 Salaried Retirement Plan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting “general principle” that “an employer’s or plan’s failure to comply with ERISA’s procedural requirements does not entitle a claimant to a substantive remedy”
• noting “the general principle that an employer’s or plan’s failure to comply with ERISA’s procedural requirements does not entitle a claimant to a substantive remedy”
• “Vesting provisions do not affect the amount of the accrued benefit ... Accrual provisions provide a formula for calculating [that] amount”
• benefits to an employee (continued...) - 23 - Section 411(d)(6)(B)(i) was added to the Code in 1984, as part of the Retirement Equity Act (REA), Pub. L. 98-397, 98 Stat. 1426 (1984

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).