RGIS International Transition Holdco, LLC v. Retail Services WIS Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreting regulation as “pertain[ing] to situations in which a pension plan 9 purchases annuities for former plan beneficiaries and participants”
• finding plaintiffs were not plan participants “[b]ecause, if successful, the plaintiffs’ claim would result in a damages award, not in an increase of vested benefit ”
• claimants who have received full extent of vested benefits under ERISA plan prior to filing suit lack standing as “participants”
• a claim for damages is not a potential future benefit within the meaning of ERISA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).