Skip to main content
· 3/3/2004

Rga Reinsurance Company v. Ulico Casualty Company

Citations

  • 355 F.3d 1136
  • 2004 WL 135817

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that clarification of an arbitration award does not constitute modification of the award
  • stating that “proceedings to vacate, modify, or remand an arbitration award must be initiated promptly within three months of the arbitration ruling”
  • affirming the district court’s resolution of a dispute about how much money an arbitration award required one party to pay the other, albeit without framing this remedy as a declaratory judgment
  • “RGA did not file its petition with the district court until April 5, 2002, greater than three months after the arbitration ruling; therefore, the district court lacked jurisdiction to modify or vacate the award.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Melloy, Beam, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.