Rfe Industries, Incorporated v. Spm Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no valid business expectancy under Virginia law where a supplier’s customers purchased goods on an “as needed” basis with no commitment to future purchases
• \[The] district court's findings [as to secondary meaning] may be disturbed on appeal only if they are clearly erroneous.\
• “[The] district court’s findings [as to secondary meaning] may be disturbed on appeal only if they are clearly erroneous.”
• \[The] district court’s findings [as to secondary meaning] may be disturbed on appeal only if they are clearly erroneous.\
• “For the reasons set forth by the Board in the summary judgment decision, we find that the above activities neither individually nor collectively constituted use of the ULTRACUTS mark in commerce[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).