Skip to main content
· 2/18/1998

Reza ESLAMINIA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Theo WHITE, Respondent-Appellee

Citations

  • 136 F.3d 1234
  • 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1143
  • 98 Daily Journal DAR 1603
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 2589
  • 1998 WL 63555

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to find structural error where the jury considered unadmitted taped comments and limiting Noushfar to its specific facts, including the large quantity and incriminating character of the extrinsic evidence in Noushfar
  • jury’s exposure to tape recorded interview of defendant that was not admitted in evidence deprived defendant of Sixth Amendment rights
  • “To be truly considered cumulative, there must be an extremely close relationship between the extrinsic evidence and the evidence actually admitted.”
  • jury's exposure to tape recorded interview of defendant that was not admitted in evidence deprived defendant of Sixth Amendment rights
  • jury's exposure to tape recorded interview of defendant that was not admitted in evidence deprived defendant of Sixth Amendment rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sneed, Schroeder, Brunetti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.