Skip to main content

Reynolds v. State

Citations

  • 221 So. 3d 754
  • 2017 WL 2562376
  • 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 8730

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The claim raised in the motion—that Appellant’s convictions and sentences are void because the information was not supported by sworn testimony of a material witness—is not only untimely, but it is also successive and frivolous.” (internal citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Makar, Ray, Wetherell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.