Reynolds v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is well settled that the question as to which of two courts of general jurisdiction should try a crime does not involve the jurisdiction of the subject matter, but only the place of trial. It is a question of venue and it may be waived by the defendant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Dunn v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1973-03-06· cited 27×
• Madden v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1990-02-12· cited 23×
• Burgess v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1984-04-17· cited 12×
• Scalf v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1981-08-26· cited 6×
• Collier v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1990-11-14· cited 6×
• Kissinger v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1970-11-20· cited 4×
• John W. Schocke v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2020-04-01
• Jackson v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1983-05-23

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Easton v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1967-07-20· cited 113×
• Manlove v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1968-01-16· cited 112×
• Green v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1952-02-06· cited 14×
• MARTIN v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1966-09-30· cited 5×