Reynolds v. Rochester

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• child's videotaped statements about sexual assault made during interview conducted by detective and social worker who were both members of Exploited and Missing Child Unit were testimonial
• the court noted that “[cjausation between the action of the defendant and the witness’ absence appears key” and the State did not cite any authority showing that the doctrine of forfeiture had been applied solely due to age
• the court noted that \[c]ausation between the action of the defendant and the witness' absence appears key\ and the State did not cite any authority showing that the doctrine of forfeiture had been applied solely due to age
• the court noted that “[c]ausation between the action of the defendant and the witness’ absence appears key” and the State did not cite any authority showing that the doctrine of forfeiture had been applied solely due to age

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).