Skip to main content
· 12/8/1995

Reynolds v. Octel Communications Corp.

Citations

  • 924 F. Supp. 743
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20230
  • 69 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1178
  • 1995 WL 810036

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding recovery of both liquidated damages under ADEA and punitive damages under Title VII would be double recovery for same conduct
  • “When reinstatement is not feasible, the equitable remedy of front pay is available at the court’s discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fish

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.