Reynolds v. Kansas Department of Transportation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• inferring, based partially on observed “cattle tracks,” that the cattle traveled through the fence gap even though no one witnessed the event
• “From this evidence, it reasonably may be inferred that the cattle crossed a KDOT fence to get onto State land, and, moreover, it reasonably may be inferred that the cattle crossed the fence where it was down.”
• for purposes of comparative fault, “a party is at fault when he or she is negligent and that negligence caused or contributed to the event which brought about the injury or damages for which claim is made”
• transportation agency had duty to maintain fences along highway
• transportation agency had duty to maintain fences along highway

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).