Reynolds v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring insurer to “pros-ecut[e] . . . counterclaims would no doubt entail extra expenditures on the part of the insurance carrier . . . [and] would be manifestly unfair”
• requiring insurer to \prosecut[e] . . . counterclaims would no doubt entail extra expenditures on the part of the insurance carrier . . . [and] would be manifestly unfair\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).