Skip to main content

Reynolds v. Gonzalez

Citations

  • 798 A.2d 67
  • 172 N.J. 266
  • 2002 N.J. LEXIS 734

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where necessary for the jury's understanding, the court must tailor the charge to the theories of the parties to enable review of the evidence in that context
  • reinforcing soundness of two-part substantial factor test that includes \need for proof of causal connection between defendant's negligence and the resultant harm\
  • reinforcing soundness of two-part substantial factor test that includes “need for proof of causal connection between defendant’s negligence and the resultant harm”
  • reversing medical-malpractice verdict for “trial court’s failure to tailor its instruction to the theories and facts presented”
  • “A mere possibility of ... causation is not enough; and when the matter remains one of pure speculation or conjecture, or the probabilities are at best evenly balanced, it becomes the duty of the court to direct a verdict for the defendant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stein, Lavecchia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.