Skip to main content
· 2/15/1909

Reynolds v. Egan

Citations

  • 123 La. 114
  • 48 So. 764
  • 1909 La. LEXIS 681

Syllabus

<p>1. Jury (§ 14*) — Right to Jury Trial — Action yor Injunction.</p> <p>Plaintiff had a right to a trial by jury. [Ed. Note. — For other oases, see Jury, Cent. Dig. § 77; Dec. Dig. § 14.*]</p> <p>2. Mandamus (§ 31*) — When Granted — Grounds.</p> <p>The writ will not issue, as the'answer of respondent shows that the issues will be heard and determined at the earliest possible opportunity.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Mandamus, Cent. Dig. § 74; Dec. Dig. § 31.*]</p> <p>(Syllabus by the' Court.)</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the Act was enacted “to even the bargaining power between consumers and sellers” (internal marks and citation omitted)
  • explaining that the Act was enacted “to even the bargaining power between consumers and sellers” (internal marks and citation omitted)
  • deceptive act requires “conduct that is likely to deceive a consumer acting reasonably under similar circumstances”
  • “Consideration . . . is often formed by mutual promises”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Breaux

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.