Reynolds v. Allstate Ins. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying coverage where insured got in his car, was struck unconscious by unknown assailant who had hidden in back seat, was driven several miles, and was dumped from car
• no PIP coverage for assault by intruder lurking in the back seat of the insured vehicle which was merely the fortuitous scene of the assault
• no PIP coverage for assault by intruder lurking in the back seat of the insured vehicle, which was merely the fortuitous scene of the assault
• No PIP coverage for assault by intruder lurking in the back seat of the insured's vehicle which was merely the fortuitous scene of the assault
• Florida law requires relationship between injury and use of automobile as mobile vehicle
• no coverage for assault by intruder lurking in back seat of insured vehicle

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).