Court of Appeals of Texas· 6/18/1980
Reynolds v. Alcorn
Citations
- 601 S.W.2d 785
- 1980 Tex. App. LEXIS 3620
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Reynolds’ reliance on the district clerk and implied reliance on the local attorney are immaterial for their acts, or lack thereof, were imputed to Reynolds
- holding that Reynolds' reliance on the district clerk and implied reliance on the local attorney are immaterial for their acts, or lack thereof, were imputed to Reynolds
- holding that Reynolds’ reliance on the district clerk and implied reliance on the local attorney are immaterial for their acts, or lack thereof, were imputed to Reynolds
- plaintiffs excuses for delay did not constitute due diligence
- plaintiff's excuses for delay did not constitute due diligence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Countiss
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Weaver v. E-Z Mart Stores, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 1997-03-18· cited 132×
- Perry v. Kroger Stores, Store No. 119Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1987-10-26· cited 131×
- Webster v. ThomasTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1999-11-18· cited 91×
- Hansler v. MainkaTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1991-03-14· cited 88×
- Southern County Mutual Insurance Co. v. OchoaTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2000-05-11· cited 83×
- Gonzalez v. Phoenix Frozen Foods, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1994-10-06· cited 73×
- Tarrant County v. VandigriffCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2002-05-02· cited 56×
- Broom v. MacMasterTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1999-06-30· cited 53×
- Belleza-Gonzalez v. VillaTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2001-06-14· cited 39×
- Martinez v. BecerraTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1990-09-06· cited 32×
- Valdez v. Charles Orsinger Buick Co.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1986-07-15· cited 31×
- prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 13,094 Armando Saenz and Sylvia Saenz v. Keller Industries of Texas, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1992-01-28· cited 29×
- Warehouse Partners v. GardnerTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1995-07-27· cited 24×
- McCord v. DoddsTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2001-08-16· cited 22×
- Fincher v. B & D Air Conditioning and Heating Co.Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1991-09-26· cited 21×
- Ramirez v. Consolidated HGM Corp.Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2004-01-08· cited 17×
- Kotz v. KotzCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1981-02-12· cited 11×
- Newman v. BroadusTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1992-07-30· cited 9×
- Perryco, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 1989-09-06· cited 4×
- Bilsing v. State Industries, Inc.S.D. Texas· 2001-10-24· cited 4×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court· 1979-10-03· cited 5,187×
- Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. San Antonio Plumbing Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court· 1965-04-21· cited 1,362×
- Zale Corporation v. RosenbaumTexas Supreme Court· 1975-03-19· cited 331×
- Rigo Manufacturing Company v. ThomasTexas Supreme Court· 1970-07-15· cited 132×
- Williams v. Houston-Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1975-12-17· cited 37×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.