Reynolds v. Alcorn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Reynolds’ reliance on the district clerk and implied reliance on the local attorney are immaterial for their acts, or lack thereof, were imputed to Reynolds
• holding that Reynolds' reliance on the district clerk and implied reliance on the local attorney are immaterial for their acts, or lack thereof, were imputed to Reynolds
• holding that Reynolds’ reliance on the district clerk and implied reliance on the local attorney are immaterial for their acts, or lack thereof, were imputed to Reynolds
• plaintiffs excuses for delay did not constitute due diligence
• plaintiff's excuses for delay did not constitute due diligence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).