Reynold C. Moore v. Steven B. Casperson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that counsel’s decision to challenge testimony solely through cross-examination was a strategic decision permitted by Strickland
• considering on habeas review a claim that a prosecutor knowingly used false evidence
• nothing in Brady requires that disclosures be made before trial because, as long as ulti- mate disclosure is made before it is too late for the defen- dant to make use of any benefits of the evidence, due process is satisfied
• Wisconsin Supreme Court’s discretion to grant judicial review is similar to that of the Illinois Supreme Court, and Boerckel requires presentation of all issues to that court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).