Skip to main content
· 4/15/1913

Reynard v. Utica & Homer Telephone Co.

Citations

  • 16 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 191

Syllabus

<p>¿¡hade Trees — May Not be. Trimmed or Interfered with by Telephone Company — Rights of Company where Its Poles are in Position.</p> <p>Where the land of an abutting owner extends to the middle of the highway, a telephone company may be enjoined from maintaining its line of poles in front of said property or from trimming the ’ trees along said line, where the poles were placed there without • first obtaining the written consent of the owner or making compensation to him, if the possession of the company has continued for less than twenty-one years.</p>

Judges: Fulton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.