Reynaldo Requena-Rodriguez v. Kenneth Pasquarell, Immigration & Naturalization Service, District Director

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that habeas jurisdiction under the transitional rules includes constitutional and statutory challenges that cannot be considered on direct review by the court of appeals
• holding that § 1252(g) does not bar a habeas review and noting that the Fourth, Sixth, Eighth, Tenth, and Eleventh Circuits have all held the same
• holding that § 1252(g) does not bar a habeas review and noting that the Fourth, Sixth, Eighth, Tenth, and Eleventh Circuits have all held the same
• holding that § 1252(g) does not bar a habeas review and noting that the Fourth, Sixth, Eighth, Tenth, and Eleventh Circuits have all held the same
• “Our decision to consider Requena’s arguments does not detract from a district court’s power to decide that legal arguments not raised before a magistrate judge are waived.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).