Skip to main content

Reyna v. State

Citations

  • 99 S.W.3d 344
  • 2003 WL 302322

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that when victim’s conduct was ambiguously aggressive, prior, specific acts of violence are admissible only so far as they tend to explain the victim’s conduct
  • holding that the decision to admit or exclude evidence is erroneous if it evinces abused discretion and that its discretion is so abused when the decision falls outside the zone of reasonable disagreement
  • holding that the decision to admit or exclude evidence is erroneous if it evinces abused discretion and that its discretion is so abused when the decision falls outside the zone of reasonable disagreement
  • holding that the decision to admit or exclude evidence is erroneous if it evinces abused discretion and that its discretion is so abused when the decision falls outside the zone of reasonable disagreement
  • explaining that such evidence of prior acts is admissible to show that “the deceased was the first aggressor”
  • finding that the complainant’s conduct of allegedly flashing his gun at the appellant and of allegedly shooting the appellant first are unambiguous acts of aggression and violence that need no explanation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holman, Gardner, Walker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.