Reyes v. Wilson Memorial Hospital

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the plaintiff did not rebut the presumption of reasonableness when the “only evidentiary rejoinder ... consists of testimony impugning the motives of the [defendants” and an argument that additional evidence could have been discovered
• contrasting Section 11137(c)’s “complete” grant of immunity with Section lllll’s more limited grant of immunity from damages
• contrasting § 11137(c)'s \complete\ grant of immunity with § 11111's more limited grant of immunity from damages and finding immunity from injunctive relief under the former statute
• “a party may not claim the right to an extension of time under Rule 56(f
• “Because the HCQIA does not provide any immunity from damages for violations of § 1983, the Court must conclude that HCQIA immunity does not attach to Count Two.”
• “Because there is no allegation . . . that the information contained within the reports—that the Plaintiff was suspended—was knowingly false, the Court concludes that the immunity applies.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).