Supreme Court· 1/16/2018
Reyes v. Sessions
Citations
- 138 S. Ct. 736
- 199 L. Ed. 2d 604
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that “imputed wealthy Americans” returning to Mexico did not constitute a particular social group
- \Procedural challenges to agency rules under the Administrative Procedure Act are subject to the general six-year limitations period in the U.S. Code.\
- “Procedural challenges to agency rules under the Administrative Procedure Act are subject to the general six-year limitations period in the U.S. Code.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- PHH Corp. v. Consumer Financial Protection BureauD.C. Circuit· 2018-01-31· cited 67×
- Miguel Diaz-Torres v. William BarrNinth Circuit· 2020-06-29· cited 61×
- Culclasure v. Comm'r of the Soc. Sec. Admin.E.D. Pennsylvania· 2019-04-16· cited 39×
- Chong McClenning v. Department of the ArmyMerit Systems Protection Board· 2022-03-31· cited 27×
- Barry Stimpson v. Midland Credit Mgmt., Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2019-12-18· cited 25×
- Cheri Marie Hanson v. Daniel BestEighth Circuit· 2019-02-08· cited 24×
- Cope v. Let's Eat Out, Inc.E.D. Missouri· 2019-01-02· cited 12×
- J-G-PBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2019-07-01· cited 11×
- Lombardo v. Saint Louis CityE.D. Missouri· 2019-02-01· cited 4×
- Gilbert v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.N.D. Ohio· 2019-04-03· cited 2×
Other cases named Reyes v. Sessions
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.