Reyes v. Marine Drilling Companies, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding same for 204 trips to Texas for inspections and reviews required by federal contractual obligations
• holding there was no general jurisdiction despite defendant’s purchase of large amounts of supplies from Texas companies and sending representatives to Texas at least 204 times to perform quality-assurance inspections
• holding same for 204 trips to Texas for inspections and reviews required by federal contractual obligations
• finding no general jurisdiction over defendant who purchased more than $183,000,000 in goods from at least 471 Texas residents and companies
• finding no general jurisdiction over defendant who purchased more than $183,000,000 in goods from at least 471 Texas residents and companies
• finding no general jurisdiction despite purchases of more than $183 million in goods in Texas from 471 sources, hundreds of contracts with Texas entities, and sales of more than $850,000 of scrap metal to Texas companies

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).