Reyes Ex Rel. Reyes v. Fairfield Properties

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an apartment complex that accepts section 8 vouchers is not a recipient of federal funds under Section 504
• holding that settlement agreements \constitute a state court judgment for purposes of Rooker–Feldman\
• finding that, although collateral estoppel barred the plaintiffs’ unlawful eviction claims due to a prior state court judgment, the plaintiffs’ additional claims were not barred
• finding that “receipt of Section 8 housing vouchers is an insufficient basis upon which to deem the premises—a private, residential apartment complex—a place of public accommodation”
• dismissing IIED claim based on “defendants’ alleged conduct in failing to provide the requested [housing] accommodations and bringing retaliatory eviction proceedings”
• “[C]onclusory assertions are not entitled to the assumption of truth, and factual allegations must plausibly support the reasonable inference that plaintiffs are entitled to relief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).