Rex Medical, L.P. v. Argon Medical Devices, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to address which statute of limitations applied because the parties did not dispute it
• stating elements that a plaintiff must show for breach of contract claim
• identifying the elements of a breach-of-contract claim under Minnesota law as “(1) formation of a contract, (2) performance by plaintiff of any conditions precedent to his right to demand performance by the defendant, and (3) breach of the contract by defendant[]”
• defendant’s commitment that plaintiff could stop taking night call after 60 years old and not having salary reduced deemed sufficiently clear and definite
• breach of the contract by defendant is an element of a breach of contract claim
• “When addressing a question as to the statute of limitations, we typically first determine which statute of limitations applies to the claims asserted.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).